Djokovic Federer's True Challenge

Rafa Nadal is Not Primary Threat to Roger's ATP Tour Dominance

© T. A. Niles

Apr 4, 2007
Novak Djokovich has the game to be a better long term threat to Roger Federer than Rafa Nadal. Djokovic's all court, versatile game is built for longevity. Nadal's isn't.

Nobody who watches or knows anything about professional tennis would question whether Roger Federer is the best tennis player of his era. Most knowledgeable players of the game including all time greats such as Rod Laver and Andre Agassi have even suggested that Roger Federer may be the best to ever play the game. Outspoken John McEnroe exclaimed in 2004, “He's the most gifted player that I've ever seen in my life. I've seen a lot of people play…This guy could be the greatest of all time.” All Roger has done since McEnroe’s comments is get better and dominate the ATP Tennis Tour!

As is the case with Federer’s PGA Tour buddy and fellow athletic genius, Tiger Woods, when you are so far beyond anyone else in your sport, fans, pundits, and commentators all offer up their sacrificial rival. After all, a spirited rivalry is the spice that adds extra flavor to any sport. Prior to the past few weeks when he lost twice to Argentine, Guillermo Canas, Federer hadn’t lost twice to an opponent since Rafael Nadal. Nadal had beaten Federer six of seven times before Federer’s victory over Nadal at Wimbledon in 2006.

No surprise then that Nadal is the player that has been touted as the rival, the one who could possibly loosen Federer’s grasp on the "World no.1" Title. Nadal's rapid rise to the no.2 ranking, his record stay at that ranking, and his dominance of the clay-court season in 2006 (including his victory over Federer in the French Championships) lends validity to the perception that he is the primary challenger to Federer’s dominance of men's tennis. Despite Nadal’s prominence over the past two years, Novak Djokovic, a 19-year old Serb, may actually be more of a threat to Federer’s supremacy.

Djokovic Emerges as Challenger

Djokovic lost to Nadal in the final at Indian Wells, then came back the following tournament with a straight-set win against Nadal in the quarterfinals of the Sony Erickson in Miami. He has yet to beat Federer, but he has a game that is much more versatile than Nadal’s, and more likely to stand the test of time against the world's best and other top players. Nadal’s game is a powerful one that is likely to win many matches and championships, especially on clay, as his 62-match win-streak attests. But it is a one-dimensional baseline game. His primary weapons are his speed and power, his consistent ability to counter attack successfully due to that speed and power, and his mental toughness. It takes incredible shot-making over an entire match to beat Nadal. That puts pressure on his opponents who often go for more than they need to in order to win points.

Few players can string together the array of shots and the patience needed over the course of a match to combat Nadal’s steely resolve, especially on clay where the pace of shots is reduced by the surface. Roger Federer is one with the talent to bring the kind of heat necessary to wilt Nadal, and given his performance this past week, so is Novak Djokovic. Novak displayed that type of shot-making during his 6-3, 6-4 defeat of Nadal in Miami, and showed surprising resolve in weathering the mental and physical storm of the 20-minute service game, in which he held serve to go up 4-2 in the second set in his victory over Canas. Perhaps most impressively, the teenager didn’t falter when the time came to finish the match.

Djokovic's Style of Play More of a Threat

Djokovic made big shots throughout the three set final with Canas and did not let the moment overcome him. Using a variety of shots, including frequent drop-shots, lob volleys, serve and volley tactics, and consistent play from the baseline, Djokovic out hit and wore down the scrappy Canas, Federer’s newest nemesis. He is crafty beyond his years, and utilizes much more variety than Nadal. Nadal’s game of out-hitting and outlasting his opponent from the baseline requires incredible fitness, and places maximum stress on the body. Nadal's nagging injuries at so young an age, combined with his style of game, do not bode well for his longevity on tour as a top player.

Djokovic on the other hand, while very sound and powerful from the baseline, often finishes points by coming to the net. He also includes a slice backhand in his shot repertoire, which is less stressful to the body than heavy, penetrating topspin shots from the baseline, which is Nadal’s forte. If Nadal’s natural style of game isn’t working on any given day, he just has to tough it out with that game. If Djokovic is having trouble with a style of play, he has the ability to change his game. This should make him more competitive than Nadal with other top players over the long haul. Over the past two decades, Pete Sampras and Roger Federer have shown that an all-court game is likely to be the dominant game in tennis, and Djokovic’s all-court game is likely to be more of a threat to Federer’s dominance than Nadal’s one-dimensional style.


The copyright of the article Djokovic Federer's True Challenge in Tennis/Racquet Sport is owned by T. A. Niles. Permission to republish Djokovic Federer's True Challenge in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.




Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Mar 8, 2009 8:52 PM
Guest :
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha epic fail my friend
Mar 29, 2009 6:52 AM
Guest :
Yes: the important factor you fail to consider in your article is that Rafael Nadal has demonstrated his ability to develop his own game and is moving to a position of all-round dominance that even Roger Federer failed to achieve. And sorry: look at the head-to-heads. 13:6 in Nadal's favour. Federer hasn't a chance on clay, it's even-stevens on hard courts and Federer has an everso slight 2:1 advantage on grass. And if beating the "greatest player of all time" consistently while the guy is still, purportedly, at the top of his game doesn't underpin Nadal's right to be considered one of the all-time greats, I don't know what does. As for Djokovic, I think Nadal showed us who's boss last week.
Mar 29, 2009 9:07 AM
T. A. Niles :
That's too funny. Hindsight is 20-20 they say. I was obviously wrong in my prediction about the Djokovic-Nadal-Federer trio and their future rankings, but this article was written two years ago, so pointing to current records only show that my assessment at the time was incorrect, not that I failed to consider important factors. I wonder if the previous commenter even read the article? I still think the reasoning at the time was sound, even if it proved to be incorrect.
3 Comments